Scope & Outputs
What the tool covers and what it produces
The tool analyses both residential and commercial cooking. You can work in dish-based mode by
selecting meals, dishes, and a fuel for each dish, or in consumption-based mode by entering your actual
monthly fuel use. Both modes feed the same energy, cost, emission, and health calculations.
What the tool covers
- Residential households and commercial kitchens such as schools, anganwadis, hotels, factories, and community kitchens
- Dish-based input (meals, dishes, and a fuel per dish) or consumption-based input (real monthly fuel use)
- Fuels: LPG, PNG, grid electricity, biogas, traditional solid biomass, and solar-ready options where applicable
What you get
- Monthly useful cooking energy, fuel input energy, and fuel quantity
- Monthly fuel cost and annual CO₂ emissions
- Overall stove-to-pot efficiency and an indoor PM2.5 health-risk indicator
- A side-by-side fuel comparison and ranked cleaner-fuel recommendations
How Dish-Based Mode Works
Calorie-normalised energy, not per-serving energy
Dish-based mode does not assume you cook a single serving of each dish you select. Instead, it sizes
each meal to the household monthly calorie need, then scales the dishes you picked so that together they
meet that calorie target. This keeps results comparable no matter how many dishes are selected.
What this means in practice:
Adding more dishes to a meal mostly redistributes that meal calorie target across them rather than
adding new energy. In a worked four-person example, selecting four dishes produced about 364 kWh per month,
while selecting every available dish produced about 373 kWh per month. So adding dishes changes the result
only slightly, and a single selected dish is scaled up to represent the whole meal.
Model Assumptions
Assumptions and constants
These are the default values the calculator uses. Energy contents, stove efficiencies, and most
emission factors are fixed model assumptions, while fuel prices and the grid CO₂ factor can be overridden
with local values on the input forms.
| Parameter |
Value |
User-adjustable |
| Calorie model |
| Calories per person per day | 2,400 kcal | No |
| Month length used for targets | 30 days | No |
| Household cooking efficiency (4-person) | 0.85 | Scales with size |
| Cooking wastage factor (4-person) | 1.133 | Formula, floor 1.05 |
| Fuel energy content |
| LPG calorific value | 12.8 kWh/kg | No |
| PNG calorific value | 10.2 kWh/SCM | No |
| Biomass energy content | 4.5 kWh/kg | No |
| Biogas energy value | 5.5 kWh/m³ | No |
| Stove efficiency |
| LPG | 0.60 | No |
| PNG | 0.70 | No |
| Grid electricity | 0.90 | No |
| Biogas and traditional solid biomass | 0.55 | No |
| CO₂ emission factors (kg CO₂ per kWh input) |
| LPG | 0.24 | No |
| PNG | 0.21 | No |
| Grid electricity | 0.65 | Yes |
| Biogas | 0.30 | No |
| Traditional solid biomass | 0.40 | No |
| Prices (local defaults) |
| LPG cylinder price | e.g. 922 Rs / 14.2 kg | Yes |
| PNG rate | e.g. 48 Rs/SCM | Yes |
| Electricity Tariff (₹/kWh) | e.g. 6.5 Rs/kWh | Yes |
| Biomass cost | e.g. 5 Rs/kg | Yes |
Health & Indoor Air
How indoor air-quality risk is estimated
Indoor PM2.5 exposure is estimated from the fuel, the kitchen ventilation setup, and daily cooking
hours, then benchmarked against WHO air-quality guidance. Cleaner fuels and better ventilation lower the
modelled exposure, and the presence of sensitive members raises the risk score above the base level.
| Kitchen ventilation scenario |
Exposure factor |
| Open Kitchen | 0.04 |
| Chimney | 0.25 |
| Exhaust Fan | 0.60 |
| No Exhaust | 0.80 |
Reading the factor:
A lower kitchen factor means better ventilation and lower modelled exposure. Longer cooking hours
raise exposure up to a capped multiplier, and sensitive household members add to the final risk score so
vulnerable groups are flagged.
Recommendations
How fuel recommendations are ranked
The current setup and every alternative fuel are scored on four weighted criteria, and the
highest-scoring options are recommended. The weights below are for the balanced preference; choosing a
different budget or priority shifts the weights toward cost, environment, or health.
| Criterion |
Weight (balanced) |
| Health | 0.40 |
| Environmental | 0.25 |
| Economic | 0.25 |
| Practicality | 0.10 |
The score
recommendation_score = health × 0.40 + environmental × 0.25 + economic × 0.25 +
practicality × 0.10. Every fuel option is scored on these four components, ranked by the combined
score, and the top options are shown as recommendations.
Environmental Grade
How the environmental grade is assigned
The environmental grade is based on emissions per unit of use, not on total emissions, so larger
households and busier kitchens are judged fairly against smaller ones.
Residential
The grade is based on annual CO₂ emissions per household member, so per-person emissions decide the grade rather than the household total.
Commercial
The grade is based on annual CO₂ emissions per serving, so a high-throughput kitchen is measured by its per-serving footprint.